Defending NaMo - Part 3: Madhuri

CONgress never learns.  12 years of hounding NaMo in Gujarat has yielded nothing but 2/3rds majority for successive NaMo administrations.  Yet they continue using the same strategy. 

Instead of attacking NaMo on facts and governance record, CONgress unleashes its dirty tricks department.  (But then CONgress doesn’t have a governance record it can defend).

CONgress sponsored NGOs and corrupt officials failed to corner NaMo in Gujarat.  Why do they think it will work in Delhi?

But let’s examine the facts of the case.  Let us assume the facts as presented by CONgress (and leftist sleaze balls) are true.

So what are the facts of the case:

1.       NaMo meets a woman (Madhuri) in 2005

2.       A strong relationship grows between the two

3.       NaMo shares his private cell number with the lady

4.       Lady has an close relationship with a Pradeep Sharma

5.       Lady shares NaMo’s private number with Pradeep Sharma

6.       In 2009 Pradeep Sharma calls NaMo on this private number

7.       An agitated NaMo tracks down source of the call (which is Pradeep Sharma)

8.       NaMo finds that Pradeep Sharma received his private number from Madhuri

9.       At this point NaMo places Madhuri under 24/7 survillance

In NaMo’s defense:

a)      If NaMo was indeed obsessed with Madhuri (as news media is suggesting) why would he wait till 2009 to start stalking her?  Why wait 4 long years. 

b)      And if NaMo did indeed develop feelings for the lady, how is that wrong.  He’s only human.

a.       He was single, lady was single.  Unlike CONgress stalwarts, who use CONgresswomen as a personal harem, NaMo did nothing wrong

c)       Did a smitten NaMo use government machinery to assist/promote the object of his ‘obession’?

d)      If there was no quid pro, if no ethics were violated the only question remains – why did NaMo place Madhuri under a 24/7 watch 4 years after the two met and bonded

e)      There’s only one answer to the above question:  Pradeep Sharma

f)       If anyone shared my number (and I’m a nobody) with an individual not known to me, I’d be pissed

g)      If I (or anyone else) had the means to chase down the caller I would

h)      We do it all the time.  Callers are mostly telemarketers calling to pitch something, but the point remains.  We all want to know who called us (if we haven’t recognized the caller id)

i)        It was even natural for NaMo to speculate why Madhuri would give his number to a Pradeep Sharma and if that number was given what was the real reason behind it

j)        Was a conspiracy brewing to target him

k)      If you share my private number with an individual not known to me, I have every right to find out the ulterior motives (if any) lurking behind such a slip up

So friends, much like other missiles launched at NaMo this too will fizzle out.  More importantly, it now makes CONgress’ own leaders fair game for speculation from BJP’s side.  The ammunition, I’m sure, is being prepared.  This election is getting ugly, fast.

NaMo must stay above all this.  Destiny has far greater plans for him.